Alphabell.

AI makes AI better.

A daily hub for work where AI is part of the loop that improves AI, each entry with its loop spelled out. Read more →

1/4
A loop in motion
AlphaEvolve
Project · Google DeepMind
Gemini models propose code changes
From the labalphaBell Qwen Open27B post-training research, with capability tradeoffs measured.Explore the model → From the labModel ObservatoryMeasured Flint and Qwen traces with published decoder maps.Open the lab tool → From the labMiniMax Video BudgetVisualize sampled frames, two-frame groups and vision placeholders.Try the inspector → From the labMOSS Blind Layout CheckCompare exact text and placement in two local images.Try the blind check → From the labAgent Request Evidence LadderSee what a trace proves about an agent's request and its outcome.Explore the cases →

Today's radar

31 Oct 2026Full radar →

8 picked from 24 candidates · 30 sources read · 74 loops indexed

  1. 01
    Loop of the dayPaperarXiv29 Oct 2026AI R&D evals

    InfraDev: Can Coding Agents Develop AI Infrastructure, and How Can We Tell?

    The loop: Coding agents develop production-grade AI infrastructure like Megatron-LM and vLLM within the InfraDev benchmark. This improves the evaluation of infrastructure engineering, guiding the development of agents that can build and optimize their own training and inference systems.

    InfraDev introduces a rigorous benchmark for evaluating coding agents on real-world AI infrastructure tasks, a crucial stepping stone toward models that can autonomously optimize their own training and inference stacks.

    loop fit 10/10Zhonghao Jiang, Xuyang Zheng et al.via arXiv
    InfraDev: Can Coding Agents Develop AI Infrastructure, and How Can We Tell?
  2. 02
    PaperarXiv29 Oct 2026Self-modifying agents

    EvoIn: Bridging Evolution and Internalization for Agent Fine-Tuning

    The loop: An agent temporarily instantiates evolved decision-making procedures in its harness to generate improved reasoning traces. The agent then fine-tunes on these traces, internalizing the logic to improve its own future decision-making without relying on the external harness.

    loop fit 9/10Yunhang Shen, Zhangquan Chen et al.via Hugging Face Papers
    EvoIn: Bridging Evolution and Internalization for Agent Fine-Tuning
  3. 03
    ProjectGitHub26 Oct 2026Self-modifying agents

    InfRec-Cardinal/The-Trinity

    The loop: Multimodal agents use capability-driven recursive self-improvement to enhance their own performance and capabilities.

    loop fit 7/10InfRec-Cardinalvia GitHub
    InfRec-Cardinal/The-Trinity
  4. 04
    PaperarXiv29 Oct 2026Tools and harness

    HEMO: Harness Self-Evolution for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization

    The loop: A large language model treats its own automatic operator design harness as a self-evolving target. By updating its retrieval, selection, and orchestration logic based on downstream performance, the system improves its ability to discover optimization operators.

    loop fit 9/10Jianghan Zhu, Cong Zhang et al.via arXiv
    HEMO: Harness Self-Evolution for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization
  5. 05
    PaperarXiv28 Oct 2026Self-reward and self-play

    Youtu-Parsing-Omni: One Encoder, One Schema, All Modalities

    The loop: The omni-modal parser generates its own rollouts against a reference-conditioned copy of itself to create token-level targets. The model is then trained on these rollouts and refreshes the reference copy with its updated weights, driving continuous self-improvement.

    loop fit 9/10Yecheng Wu, Song Han et al.via Hugging Face Papers
    Youtu-Parsing-Omni: One Encoder, One Schema, All Modalities
  6. 06
    PaperarXiv28 Oct 2026Self-reward and self-play

    Weaken to Strengthen: Weakening-Induced On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Reasoning Models

    The loop: A reasoning model generates a weaker counterpart of itself through quantization or pruning to create a contrastive training signal. This enables on-policy self-distillation without privileged information, improving the original model's accuracy on reasoning tasks.

    loop fit 9/10Miri Liu, Xiayu Zhao, Encheng Xie, ChengXiang Zhaivia arXiv
    Weaken to Strengthen: Weakening-Induced On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Reasoning Models
  7. 07
    PaperarXiv28 Oct 2026AI R&D evals

    FeatureArc: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Evolving Features

    The loop: Coding agents extend software features over successive stages and build on their own earlier code within the FeatureArc benchmark. This improves the evaluation of agentic self-maintenance, guiding the development of agents capable of long-term iterative software engineering.

    loop fit 9/10Yunlong Wang, Alyssa Wu, Cuiyun Gao, Jia Feng, Songyuanyi Lu, Zhichao Huvia arXiv
    FeatureArc: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Evolving Features
  8. 08
    PaperarXiv28 Oct 2026Self-modifying agents

    InfRec-Cardinal/The-Trinity

    The loop: Multimodal agents undertake capability-driven recursive self-improvement within The Trinity framework. By iteratively enhancing their own performance, the agents systematically expand their multimodal capabilities.

    loop fit 7/10Hehai Lin, Qi Yang et al.via arXiv
    InfRec-Cardinal/The-Trinity
AlphaEvolve
ProjectGoogle DeepMind
AlphaEvolve
  1. Gemini models propose code changes
  2. Evaluators keep best scoring versions
  3. Finds better Gemini training kernels
  4. Lowers cost to train next Gemini models
  5. repeat
Kernels and compilersGoogle DeepMind · 2025
Darwin Gödel Machine
PaperarXiv
Darwin Gödel Machine
  1. Coding agent edits its own code
  2. Scored child agents enter the archive
  3. Archived agents make later self modifications
  4. repeat
Self-modifying agentsUBC, Vector Institute, Sakana AI · 2025
AlphaChip
ProjectGoogle DeepMind
AlphaChip
  1. RL agent lays out TPU blocks
  2. Better layouts make AI hardware cheaper
  3. Agent pre-trains on earlier chip generations
  4. repeat
Hardware and chipsGoogle DeepMind, Google Research · 2020
autoresearch
Mini-projectGitHub
autoresearch
  1. Coding agent edits LLM training script
  2. Runs a 5-minute training job
  3. Keeps change if validation improves
  4. Changes transferred to larger models
  5. repeat
Research automationAndrej Karpathy · 2026
ScholarEvolve
PaperarXiv
ScholarEvolve
  1. Research agent writes harness mutation blueprints
  2. Coding agent implements harness module changes
  3. Winning harness becomes the new champion
  4. New champion harness runs further generations
  5. repeat
Tools and harnessYang et al. (UC Santa Barbara, Microsoft) · 2026
Nemotron-4 340B
PaperarXiv
Nemotron-4 340B
  1. Aligned model generates training data
  2. Reward model judges and filters it
  3. Data trains next intermediate instruct model
  4. Next model generates better alignment data
  5. repeat
Training dataNVIDIA · 2024
Self-Rewarding LMs
PaperarXiv
Self-Rewarding LMs
  1. Model generates candidate responses to prompts
  2. Model scores them itself as a judge
  3. Scores become preference pairs for DPO
  4. Trained model becomes next generator and judge
  5. repeat
Self-reward and self-playMeta, NYU (Yuan et al.) · 2024
Claude Code
ProjectAnthropic
Claude Code
  1. Claude Code writes its own code changes
  2. Changes become next Claude Code versions
  3. Release becomes harness for next development round
  4. repeat
Self-modifying agentsAnthropic · 2025
KernelEvolve
ProjectarXiv
KernelEvolve
  1. LLM agents write and benchmark kernels
  2. Kernels speed up AI model training
  3. Session data post-trains smaller kernel models
  4. repeat
Kernels and compilersMeta · 2025
PostTrainBench
BenchmarkarXiv
PostTrainBench
  1. Coding agent writes fine-tuning code
  2. Agent post-trains a base LLM
  3. Trained model scored on target benchmark
  4. One turn of model training another
  5. repeat
AI R&D evalsELLIS Institute Tubingen, MPI-IS, University of Tubingen, Thoughtful Lab (Rank et al.) · 2026
Self-training learned optimizers
FoundationarXiv
Self-training learned optimizers
  1. Learned optimizers update other learned optimizers
  2. Training keeps best performing optimizer parameters
  3. Better optimizers train each other faster
  4. repeat
Architecture and optimizer searchMetz et al. (Google Research, Brain Team) · 2021
CoT monitoring
PaperarXiv
CoT monitoring
  1. LLM reads reasoning model thoughts
  2. LLM flags reward hacking behavior
  3. Signal feeds back into training reward
  4. Trains more aligned capable agents
  5. repeat
Interpretability and oversightOpenAI (Baker et al.) · 2025

Support for loop research

How to apply →

Have a loop worth building?

Tell us what the AI improves and how the improvement comes back. Applications for grants, fellowships and compute all start on the contact page.

Get in touch