Alphabell.

AI makes AI better.

A daily hub for work where AI is part of the loop that improves AI, each entry with its loop spelled out. Read more →

1/4
A loop in motion
AlphaEvolve
Project · Google DeepMind
Gemini models propose code changes
From the labalphaBell Qwen Open27B post-training research, with capability tradeoffs measured.Explore the model → From the labModel ObservatoryMeasured Flint and Qwen traces with published decoder maps.Open the lab tool → From the labMiniMax Video BudgetVisualize sampled frames, two-frame groups and vision placeholders.Try the inspector → From the labMOSS Blind Layout CheckCompare exact text and placement in two local images.Try the blind check → From the labAgent Request Evidence LadderSee what a trace proves about an agent's request and its outcome.Explore the cases →

Today's radar

7 Nov 2026Full radar →

12 picked from 14 candidates · 31 sources read · 75 loops indexed

  1. 01
    Loop of the dayPaperarXiv2 Nov 2026Research automation

    Independent Assessment of AI R&D Acceleration at Anthropic in October 2026

    The loop: Anthropic AI systems perform AI R&D work, which improves Anthropic's models and tools. This makes the systems or their direct successors better at performing further AI R&D work.

    Independent confirmation that frontier labs are actively using their own models to accelerate internal AI R&D.

    loop fit 9/10Erkang Zhu, Yin Lin et al.via arXiv
    Independent Assessment of AI R&D Acceleration at Anthropic in October 2026
  2. 02
    PaperarXiv6 Nov 2026Tools and harness

    HarnessFlow: MCTS-Guided Harness Optimization for LLM Agents

    The loop: A coding agent uses Monte Carlo Tree Search to iteratively search for and refine its own executable harness. This optimized harness directly governs the agent's interaction with tools and the environment, improving its performance on subsequent tasks.

    loop fit 9/10Haoyang Zhang, Qumeng Sun, Xiao Zhang, Xiang Liu, Zhidong Fan, Junjie Wangvia arXiv
    HarnessFlow: MCTS-Guided Harness Optimization for LLM Agents
  3. 03
    Blog postMETR5 Nov 2026Research automation

    Review of the "Risks from automated R&D" section in Anthropic's Risk Report (August 2026)

    The loop: AI systems at Anthropic are used to accelerate their own R&D, a process independently verified by METR.

    loop fit 9/10via METR
    Review of the "Risks from automated R&D" section in Anthropic's Risk Report (August 2026)
  4. 04
    PaperarXiv6 Nov 2026AI R&D evals

    IdeaTaste: Do LLMs Share the Research Taste of Human Researchers?

    The loop: LLM agents write research proposals based on a literature snapshot, which are scored against actual future publications. This benchmark measures AI performance on AI research tasks, providing the necessary evaluation signal to improve future AI research agents.

    loop fit 9/10Y. L. Li, Y. H. Wuvia arXiv
    IdeaTaste: Do LLMs Share the Research Taste of Human Researchers?
  5. 05
    Blog postMETR5 Nov 2026Research automation

    Independent Assessment of AI R&D Acceleration at Anthropic in October 2026

    The loop: Anthropic AI systems perform AI R&D work, which improves Anthropic's models and tools, which makes the systems better at AI R&D work.

    loop fit 9/10via METR
    Independent Assessment of AI R&D Acceleration at Anthropic in October 2026
  6. 06
    PaperarXiv6 Nov 2026Training data

    Recursa: Toward Recursively Self-Improving Foundation Model Systems

    The loop: The Recursa foundation model system uses parallel learners to execute tasks and synthesize local improvements. These improvements are validated and merged into the system's own knowledge repository, enabling the model to adapt to new domains through recursive self-improvement.

    loop fit 9/10Yiqiao Jin, Yiyang Wang, Lucheng Fu, Yijia Xiao, Yinyi Luo, Haoxin Liu, B....via arXiv
    Recursa: Toward Recursively Self-Improving Foundation Model Systems
  7. 07
    PaperarXiv5 Nov 2026Self-reward and self-play

    SEAL: Synergistic Co-Evolution of Agents and Learning Environments

    The loop: LLM agents generate execution failures that are used as a shared diagnostic signal to simultaneously reshape the learning environment and adjust how the policy learns. This keeps the training environment aligned with the agent's evolving needs, directly improving the agent's subsequent training.

    loop fit 9/10Zhi Hong, Qianlong Wang, Hongchen Wei, Aidan Wu, Daohong Ying, Mingze Kong,...via arXiv
    SEAL: Synergistic Co-Evolution of Agents and Learning Environments
  8. 08
    PaperarXiv6 Nov 2026Self-reward and self-play

    Better honeypots, fewer tries: training an optimizer to make PPO cheat

    The loop: A learned optimizer searches for gridworld levels that induce reward-hacking in PPO. This automated discovery of honeypots improves the evaluation of reinforcement learning algorithms, helping developers build more robust training processes.

    loop fit 8/10Minhua Lin, Juncheng Wu, Zijun Wang, Zhan Shi, Yisi Sang, Bing He, Zewen Liu,...via arXiv
    Better honeypots, fewer tries: training an optimizer to make PPO cheat
AlphaEvolve
ProjectGoogle DeepMind
AlphaEvolve
  1. Gemini models propose code changes
  2. Evaluators keep best scoring versions
  3. Finds better Gemini training kernels
  4. Lowers cost to train next Gemini models
  5. repeat
Kernels and compilersGoogle DeepMind · 2025
Darwin Gödel Machine
PaperarXiv
Darwin Gödel Machine
  1. Coding agent edits its own code
  2. Scored child agents enter the archive
  3. Archived agents make later self modifications
  4. repeat
Self-modifying agentsUBC, Vector Institute, Sakana AI · 2025
AlphaChip
ProjectGoogle DeepMind
AlphaChip
  1. RL agent lays out TPU blocks
  2. Better layouts make AI hardware cheaper
  3. Agent pre-trains on earlier chip generations
  4. repeat
Hardware and chipsGoogle DeepMind, Google Research · 2020
autoresearch
Mini-projectGitHub
autoresearch
  1. Coding agent edits LLM training script
  2. Runs a 5-minute training job
  3. Keeps change if validation improves
  4. Changes transferred to larger models
  5. repeat
Research automationAndrej Karpathy · 2026
ScholarEvolve
PaperarXiv
ScholarEvolve
  1. Research agent writes harness mutation blueprints
  2. Coding agent implements harness module changes
  3. Winning harness becomes the new champion
  4. New champion harness runs further generations
  5. repeat
Tools and harnessYang et al. (UC Santa Barbara, Microsoft) · 2026
Nemotron-4 340B
PaperarXiv
Nemotron-4 340B
  1. Aligned model generates training data
  2. Reward model judges and filters it
  3. Data trains next intermediate instruct model
  4. Next model generates better alignment data
  5. repeat
Training dataNVIDIA · 2024
Self-Rewarding LMs
PaperarXiv
Self-Rewarding LMs
  1. Model generates candidate responses to prompts
  2. Model scores them itself as a judge
  3. Scores become preference pairs for DPO
  4. Trained model becomes next generator and judge
  5. repeat
Self-reward and self-playMeta, NYU (Yuan et al.) · 2024
Claude Code
ProjectAnthropic
Claude Code
  1. Claude Code writes its own code changes
  2. Changes become next Claude Code versions
  3. Release becomes harness for next development round
  4. repeat
Self-modifying agentsAnthropic · 2025
KernelEvolve
ProjectarXiv
KernelEvolve
  1. LLM agents write and benchmark kernels
  2. Kernels speed up AI model training
  3. Session data post-trains smaller kernel models
  4. repeat
Kernels and compilersMeta · 2025
PostTrainBench
BenchmarkarXiv
PostTrainBench
  1. Coding agent writes fine-tuning code
  2. Agent post-trains a base LLM
  3. Trained model scored on target benchmark
  4. One turn of model training another
  5. repeat
AI R&D evalsELLIS Institute Tubingen, MPI-IS, University of Tubingen, Thoughtful Lab (Rank et al.) · 2026
Self-training learned optimizers
FoundationarXiv
Self-training learned optimizers
  1. Learned optimizers update other learned optimizers
  2. Training keeps best performing optimizer parameters
  3. Better optimizers train each other faster
  4. repeat
Architecture and optimizer searchMetz et al. (Google Research, Brain Team) · 2021
CoT monitoring
PaperarXiv
CoT monitoring
  1. LLM reads reasoning model thoughts
  2. LLM flags reward hacking behavior
  3. Signal feeds back into training reward
  4. Trains more aligned capable agents
  5. repeat
Interpretability and oversightOpenAI (Baker et al.) · 2025

Support for loop research

How to apply →

Have a loop worth building?

Tell us what the AI improves and how the improvement comes back. Applications for grants, fellowships and compute all start on the contact page.

Get in touch